🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to enact a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," commented one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and suitable for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.